GAMMA Questions

Dear Charles,
when running offset_fitm in non-interactive way (interact_mode=0) I get the following information:

*** interative least-squares coefficients solution: 5 ***
solution: 1341 offset estimates accepted out of 4096 samples
range offset poly. coeff.:                2.21904
azimuth offset poly. coeff.:             -1.92016
model fit std. dev. (samples) range: 0.8201   azimuth: 1.1123
range, azimuth error thresholds:     2.05030     2.78074
cross-correlation threshold:     0.10000

range fit SVD singular values:        7.64950e+00
azimuth fit SVD singular values:      7.64950e+00

*** interative least-squares coefficients solution: 6 ***
solution: 1313 offset estimates accepted out of 4096 samples
range offset poly. coeff.:                2.19729
azimuth offset poly. coeff.:             -1.92980
model fit std. dev. (samples) range: 0.7787   azimuth: 1.0958

total number of culling iterations: 6
final solution: 1313 offset estimates accepted out of 4096 samples

final range offset poly. coeff.:                2.19729
final azimuth offset poly. coeff.:             -1.92980

final range offset poly. coeff. errors:     1.01797e-01
final azimuth offset poly. coeff. errors:   1.43258e-01
final model fit std. dev. (samples) range: 0.7787   azimuth: 1.0958

However, when I run it in the interactive mode (interact_mode=1), I get these information:

*** interative least-squares coefficients solution: 1 ***
solution: 903 offset estimates accepted out of 16384 samples
range offset poly. coeff.:                1.90623
azimuth offset poly. coeff.:             -2.31012
model fit std. dev. (samples) range: 0.2309   azimuth: 0.2226

set new error bounds? (0: no, 1: yes): 
enter minimum cross-correlation threshold: enter the range and azimuth error thresholds: range, azimuth error thresholds:     0.30000     0.30000
cross-correlation threshold:     0.10000

range fit SVD singular values:        5.88723e+00
azimuth fit SVD singular values:      5.88723e+00

*** interative least-squares coefficients solution: 1 ***
solution: 528 offset estimates accepted out of 16384 samples
range offset poly. coeff.:                1.88880
azimuth offset poly. coeff.:             -2.31180
model fit std. dev. (samples) range: 0.1710   azimuth: 0.1771

set new error bounds? (0: no, 1: yes): 
binary culled offsets: 20170501_vv.coffs
updating DIFF/GEO parameters: 20170501_vv.diff.par

Can we please have in the interactive mode after accepting the results also a final summary like this:

total number of culling iterations: 6
final solution: 1313 offset estimates accepted out of 4096 samples

final range offset poly. coeff.:                2.19729
final azimuth offset poly. coeff.:             -1.92980

final range offset poly. coeff. errors:     1.01797e-01
final azimuth offset poly. coeff. errors:   1.43258e-01
final model fit std. dev. (samples) range: 0.7787   azimuth: 1.0958

I am especially interested in the final range offset poly. coeff. errors and final azimuth offset poly. coeff. errors.

Thank you very much!
Best, Julia