Forums » GAMMA Processing » SAR Data Preprocessing » Sentinel-1 »
par_S1_SLC fails for current S1 data
Added by Julia Neelmeijer over 6 years ago
Dear Charles,
I try to import current S1 data (e.g. S1B_IW_SLC__1SDV_20180530T051633_20180530T051701_011146_01471D_9B4A.SAFE) with par_S1_SLC, however the process does not run through and only generates empty files. I tried the same with data from 2016, and everything works fine. Could it be that some xml formatting in the Sentinel-1 metadata has changed, which leads to this effect?
This is the log file for the failed processing. It stops while reading the numbers of noise vectors:
par_S1_SLC S1B_IW_SLC__1SDV_20180530T051633_20180530T051701_011146_01471D_9B4A.SAFE/measurement/s1b-iw1-slc-vv-20180530t051633-20180530t051659-011146-01471d-004.tiff S1B_IW_SLC__1SDV_20180530T051633_20180530T051701_011146_01471D_9B4A.SAFE/annotation/s1b-iw1-slc-vv-20180530t051633-20180530t051659-011146-01471d-004.xml S1B_IW_SLC__1SDV_20180530T051633_20180530T051701_011146_01471D_9B4A.SAFE/annotation/calibration/calibration-s1b-iw1-slc-vv-20180530t051633-20180530t051659-011146-01471d-004.xml S1B_IW_SLC__1SDV_20180530T051633_20180530T051701_011146_01471D_9B4A.SAFE/annotation/calibration/noise-s1b-iw1-slc-vv-20180530t051633-20180530t051659-011146-01471d-004.xml dummy/SLC/slc_20180530/20180530_iw1.slc.par dummy/SLC/slc_20180530/20180530_iw1.slc dummy/SLC/slc_20180530/20180530_iw1.slc.tops_par
Warning: number of azimuthFmRateList polynomials should equal number of bursts+1, num. bursts:9 num. polynomials: 11
*** Generate SLC parameter and image files for Sentinel-1 SLC data ***
*** Copyright 2017, Gamma Remote Sensing, v3.4 19-May-2017 awi/clw ***
GeoTIFF data set: S1B_IW_SLC__1SDV_20180530T051633_20180530T051701_011146_01471D_9B4A.SAFE/measurement/s1b-iw1-slc-vv-20180530t051633-20180530t051659-011146-01471d-004.tiff
GeoTIFF basename: s1b-iw1-slc-vv-20180530t051633-20180530t051659-011146-01471d-004.tiff
GDAL driver: GTiffGeoTIFF
SLC image size: X, Y, Z: 23247x13572x1
GeoTIFF software version: Sentinel-1 IPF 002.90
S1 XML annotation: S1B_IW_SLC__1SDV_20180530T051633_20180530T051701_011146_01471D_9B4A.SAFE/annotation/s1b-iw1-slc-vv-20180530t051633-20180530t051659-011146-01471d-004.xml
S1 XML calibration LUT: S1B_IW_SLC__1SDV_20180530T051633_20180530T051701_011146_01471D_9B4A.SAFE/annotation/calibration/calibration-s1b-iw1-slc-vv-20180530t051633-20180530t051659-011146-01471d-004.xml
number of lines in the Sentinel-1 calibration LUT file: 290
S1 XML noise LUT: S1B_IW_SLC__1SDV_20180530T051633_20180530T051701_011146_01471D_9B4A.SAFE/annotation/calibration/noise-s1b-iw1-slc-vv-20180530t051633-20180530t051659-011146-01471d-004.xml
number of lines in the Sentinel-1 noise LUT file: 101
SLC output data format: FCOMPLEX
number of lines in the Sentinel-1 annotation file: 4922
sensor: S1B IW IW1 VV
absoluteOrbitNumber: 11146
SLC image first line UTC time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 33.918239 seconds of day: 18993.918239
SLC image last line UTC time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 59.0824 seconds of day: 19019.082359
GeoTIFF image data format: 16 bit Signed Integer Complex
orbit ascending node time:: 2018 5 30 4 41 26.113406 seconds of day: 16886.113406
azimuth steering rate (deg/s): -1.59036878
azimuth line time interval (s): 2.05555630e-03
effective PRF calculated from azimuth line time interval (Hz): 486.486310
calculating SLC end time from azimuth time interval: 19019.082359
number of state vectors: 17
read the state vectors that cover the image (+/- 15 sec): 18978.9182 19034.0824
timeStamp 1: 2018 5 30 5 15 26.1457490 18926.1457490
timeStamp 1: 2018 5 30 5 15 36.1457490 18936.1457490
timeStamp 1: 2018 5 30 5 15 46.1457490 18946.1457490
timeStamp 1: 2018 5 30 5 15 56.1457490 18956.1457490
timeStamp 1: 2018 5 30 5 16 6.1457490 18966.1457490
timeStamp 1: 2018 5 30 5 16 16.1457490 18976.1457490
timeStamp 1: 2018 5 30 5 16 26.1457490 18986.1457490
timeStamp 2: 2018 5 30 5 16 36.1457490 18996.1457490
timeStamp 3: 2018 5 30 5 16 46.1457490 19006.1457490
timeStamp 4: 2018 5 30 5 16 56.1457490 19016.1457490
timeStamp 5: 2018 5 30 5 17 6.1457490 19026.1457490
timeStamp 6: 2018 5 30 5 17 16.1457490 19036.1457490
time of first selected state vector (s): 18986.145749
time of last selected state vector (s): 19036.145749
number of state vectors: 6
time interval between state vectors (s): 10.000000
ADC sampling frequency (Hz): 6.434524e+07
effective ADC range sampling frequency calculated from range pixel spacing (Hz): 6.434524e+07
number of SLC bursts: 9
number of azimuthFmRateList polynomials: 11
burst 1: azimuthFmRateList time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 32.7314 18992.7314
azimuthFmRatePolynomial in 2.9+ Format
burst 2: azimuthFmRateList time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 35.4897 18995.4897
azimuthFmRatePolynomial in 2.9+ Format
burst 3: azimuthFmRateList time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 38.2480 18998.2480
azimuthFmRatePolynomial in 2.9+ Format
burst 4: azimuthFmRateList time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 41.0063 19001.0063
azimuthFmRatePolynomial in 2.9+ Format
burst 5: azimuthFmRateList time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 43.7645 19003.7645
azimuthFmRatePolynomial in 2.9+ Format
burst 6: azimuthFmRateList time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 46.5228 19006.5228
azimuthFmRatePolynomial in 2.9+ Format
burst 7: azimuthFmRateList time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 49.2811 19009.2811
azimuthFmRatePolynomial in 2.9+ Format
burst 8: azimuthFmRateList time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 52.0394 19012.0394
azimuthFmRatePolynomial in 2.9+ Format
burst 9: azimuthFmRateList time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 54.7976 19014.7976
azimuthFmRatePolynomial in 2.9+ Format
number of Doppler polynomials: 11
WARNING: number of doppler polynomials 11 not the same as the number of bursts: 9
Burst 1:
Doppler Centroid Estimate time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 33.6942 18993.6942
Doppler centroid estimated from data: -14.390080 -21746.120000 19592610.000000
DCE Azimuth Start time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 32.3055 18992.3055
DCE Azimuth Stop time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 35.0828 18995.0828
Number of DCE fine list elements: 20
Burst 2:
Doppler Centroid Estimate time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 36.4524 18996.4524
Doppler centroid estimated from data: -20.419140 9336.967000 -2046520.000000
DCE Azimuth Start time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 35.0638 18995.0638
DCE Azimuth Stop time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 37.8411 18997.8411
Number of DCE fine list elements: 20
Burst 3:
Doppler Centroid Estimate time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 39.2107 18999.2107
Doppler centroid estimated from data: -21.200700 7405.423000 -3931879.000000
DCE Azimuth Start time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 37.8221 18997.8221
DCE Azimuth Stop time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 40.5994 19000.5994
Number of DCE fine list elements: 20
Burst 4:
Doppler Centroid Estimate time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 41.9690 19001.9690
Doppler centroid estimated from data: -24.371820 15987.240000 -8547302.000000
DCE Azimuth Start time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 40.5803 19000.5803
DCE Azimuth Stop time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 43.3577 19003.3577
Number of DCE fine list elements: 20
Burst 5:
Doppler Centroid Estimate time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 44.7273 19004.7273
Doppler centroid estimated from data: -19.108140 -10253.020000 10838470.000000
DCE Azimuth Start time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 43.3386 19003.3386
DCE Azimuth Stop time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 46.1159 19006.1159
Number of DCE fine list elements: 20
Burst 6:
Doppler Centroid Estimate time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 47.4856 19007.4856
Doppler centroid estimated from data: -20.530560 -437.360100 7626734.000000
DCE Azimuth Start time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 46.0969 19006.0969
DCE Azimuth Stop time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 48.8742 19008.8742
Number of DCE fine list elements: 20
Burst 7:
Doppler Centroid Estimate time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 50.2438 19010.2438
Doppler centroid estimated from data: -26.570290 34766.180000 -34421380.000000
DCE Azimuth Start time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 48.8552 19008.8552
DCE Azimuth Stop time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 51.6325 19011.6325
Number of DCE fine list elements: 20
Burst 8:
Doppler Centroid Estimate time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 53.0021 19013.0021
Doppler centroid estimated from data: -16.772150 -15864.880000 11752800.000000
DCE Azimuth Start time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 51.6135 19011.6135
DCE Azimuth Stop time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 54.3908 19014.3908
Number of DCE fine list elements: 20
Burst 9:
Doppler Centroid Estimate time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 55.7604 19015.7604
Doppler centroid estimated from data: -29.971290 34533.260000 -23206790.000000
DCE Azimuth Start time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 54.3717 19014.3717
DCE Azimuth Stop time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 57.1490 19017.1490
Number of DCE fine list elements: 20
Burst 10:
Doppler Centroid Estimate time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 58.5187 19018.5187
Doppler centroid estimated from data: -27.875650 40629.520000 -34388020.000000
DCE Azimuth Start time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 57.1300 19017.1300
DCE Azimuth Stop time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 59.9073 19019.9073
Number of DCE fine list elements: 20
Burst 11:
Doppler Centroid Estimate time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 17 1.2769 19021.2769
Doppler centroid estimated from data: -26.281830 10810.070000 -2784562.000000
DCE Azimuth Start time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 59.8883 19019.8883
DCE Azimuth Stop time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 17 2.6656 19022.6656
Number of DCE fine list elements: 20
Burst 1:
Azimuth time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 33.9182 18993.9182
Sensing time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 35.0705 18995.0705
burst byte offset: 0
number entries in the first valid sample listt: 1508
number of entries in the last valid sample list: 1508
Burst 2:
Azimuth time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 36.6768 18996.6768
Sensing time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 37.8288 18997.8288
burst byte offset: 280451808
number entries in the first valid sample listt: 1508
number of entries in the last valid sample list: 1508
Burst 3:
Azimuth time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 39.4333 18999.4333
Sensing time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 40.5871 19000.5871
burst byte offset: 560903616
number entries in the first valid sample listt: 1508
number of entries in the last valid sample list: 1508
Burst 4:
Azimuth time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 42.1939 19002.1939
Sensing time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 43.3453 19003.3453
burst byte offset: 841355424
number entries in the first valid sample listt: 1508
number of entries in the last valid sample list: 1508
Burst 5:
Azimuth time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 44.9525 19004.9525
Sensing time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 46.1036 19006.1036
burst byte offset: 1121807232
number entries in the first valid sample listt: 1508
number of entries in the last valid sample list: 1508
Burst 6:
Azimuth time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 47.7090 19007.7090
Sensing time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 48.8619 19008.8619
burst byte offset: 1402259040
number entries in the first valid sample listt: 1508
number of entries in the last valid sample list: 1508
Burst 7:
Azimuth time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 50.4696 19010.4696
Sensing time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 51.6202 19011.6202
burst byte offset: 1682710848
number entries in the first valid sample listt: 1508
number of entries in the last valid sample list: 1508
Burst 8:
Azimuth time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 53.2240 19013.2240
Sensing time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 54.3784 19014.3784
burst byte offset: 1963162656
number entries in the first valid sample listt: 1508
number of entries in the last valid sample list: 1508
Burst 9:
Azimuth time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 55.9846 19015.9846
Sensing time stamp: 2018 5 30 5 16 57.1367 19017.1367
burst byte offset: 2243614464
number entries in the first valid sample listt: 1508
number of entries in the last valid sample list: 1508
actual azimuth line time interval (s): 0.00206
effective PRF derived from azimuth line time interval (p1.tazi): 486.48631
burst time interval (s): 2.7582770
image burst: 1 time_past_ascending_node (s): 2108.957104 effective burst number: 764.59221
image burst: 2 time_past_ascending_node (s): 2111.715381 effective burst number: 765.59221
image burst: 3 time_past_ascending_node (s): 2114.473658 effective burst number: 766.59221
image burst: 4 time_past_ascending_node (s): 2117.231935 effective burst number: 767.59221
image burst: 5 time_past_ascending_node (s): 2119.990212 effective burst number: 768.59221
image burst: 6 time_past_ascending_node (s): 2122.748489 effective burst number: 769.59221
image burst: 7 time_past_ascending_node (s): 2125.506766 effective burst number: 770.59221
image burst: 8 time_past_ascending_node (s): 2128.265043 effective burst number: 771.59221
image burst: 9 time_past_ascending_node (s): 2131.023320 effective burst number: 772.59221
Gamma Interferometric SAR Processor (ISP) - TOPS SLC Parameter File
number_of_bursts: 9
lines_per_bursts: 1508
az_steering_rate: -1.590368784 (deg/s)
ascending_node_date: 2018 5 30 4 41 26.1134
ascending_node_time: 16886.1134060 s
burst_interval: 2.7582770 s
burst_date_1: 2018-05-30T05:16:33.918239
burst_start_time_1: 18993.9182390 s
sensing_date_1: 2018-05-30T05:16:35.070510
sensing_start_time_1: 18995.0705100 s
sensing_position_1: 4158711.1303 1604928.8961 5485744.9225 m m m
asc_node_delta_1: 2108.9571040 s
burst_asc_node_1: 764.5922088 s
burst_boffset_1: 0
doppler_date_1: 2018-05-30T05:16:33.694170
doppler_time_1: 18993.694170 s
doppler_srdelay_1: 5.35713e-03 s
doppler_polynomial_1: -14.39008 -21746.12000 1.95926e+07 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00
az_fmrate_date_1: 2018-05-30T05:16:32.731430
az_fmrate_time_1: 18992.731430 s
az_fmrate_srdelay_1: 5.33235e-03 s
az_fmrate_polynomial_1: -2322.54235 452305.02124 -7.94854e+07 0.00000e+00
first_valid_sample_1: 1594 samples
last_valid_sample_1: 21973 samples
first_valid_line_1: 21 lines
last_valid_line_1: 1489 lines
burst_win_1: 0.0000 0.0000 0.000000 0.000000 0 0 0 0
burst_date_2: 2018-05-30T05:16:36.676796
burst_start_time_2: 18996.6767960 s
sensing_date_2: 2018-05-30T05:16:37.828787
sensing_start_time_2: 18997.8287870 s
sensing_position_2: 4175324.3318 1605364.1218 5473014.9150 m m m
asc_node_delta_2: 2111.7153810 s
burst_asc_node_2: 765.5922088 s
burst_boffset_2: 280451808
doppler_date_2: 2018-05-30T05:16:36.452447
doppler_time_2: 18996.452447 s
doppler_srdelay_2: 5.35713e-03 s
doppler_polynomial_2: -20.41914 9336.96700 -2.04652e+06 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00
az_fmrate_date_2: 2018-05-30T05:16:35.489707
az_fmrate_time_2: 18995.489707 s
az_fmrate_srdelay_2: 5.33235e-03 s
az_fmrate_polynomial_2: -2322.62109 452290.64422 -7.94750e+07 0.00000e+00
first_valid_sample_2: 1499 samples
last_valid_sample_2: 21879 samples
first_valid_line_2: 20 lines
last_valid_line_2: 1489 lines
burst_win_2: 0.0000 0.0000 0.000000 0.000000 0 0 0 0
burst_date_3: 2018-05-30T05:16:39.433297
burst_start_time_3: 18999.4332970 s
sensing_date_3: 2018-05-30T05:16:40.587064
sensing_start_time_3: 19000.5870640 s
sensing_position_3: 4191902.1159 1605778.9875 5460237.9120 m m m
asc_node_delta_3: 2114.4736580 s
burst_asc_node_3: 766.5922088 s
burst_boffset_3: 560903616
doppler_date_3: 2018-05-30T05:16:39.210724
doppler_time_3: 18999.210724 s
doppler_srdelay_3: 5.35566e-03 s
doppler_polynomial_3: -21.20070 7405.42300 -3.93188e+06 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00
az_fmrate_date_3: 2018-05-30T05:16:38.247984
az_fmrate_time_3: 18998.247984 s
az_fmrate_srdelay_3: 5.33235e-03 s
az_fmrate_polynomial_3: -2322.69845 452277.63240 -7.94696e+07 0.00000e+00
first_valid_sample_3: 1499 samples
last_valid_sample_3: 21879 samples
first_valid_line_3: 21 lines
last_valid_line_3: 1489 lines
burst_win_3: 0.0000 0.0000 0.000000 0.000000 0 0 0 0
burst_date_4: 2018-05-30T05:16:42.193909
burst_start_time_4: 19002.1939090 s
sensing_date_4: 2018-05-30T05:16:43.345341
sensing_start_time_4: 19003.3453410 s
sensing_position_4: 4208444.3328 1606173.5039 5447414.0228 m m m
asc_node_delta_4: 2117.2319350 s
burst_asc_node_4: 767.5922088 s
burst_boffset_4: 841355424
doppler_date_4: 2018-05-30T05:16:41.969001
doppler_time_4: 19001.969001 s
doppler_srdelay_4: 5.35566e-03 s
doppler_polynomial_4: -24.37182 15987.24000 -8.54730e+06 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00
az_fmrate_date_4: 2018-05-30T05:16:41.006261
az_fmrate_time_4: 19001.006261 s
az_fmrate_srdelay_4: 5.33235e-03 s
az_fmrate_polynomial_4: -2322.77929 452262.56873 -7.94574e+07 0.00000e+00
first_valid_sample_4: 1499 samples
last_valid_sample_4: 21905 samples
first_valid_line_4: 20 lines
last_valid_line_4: 1489 lines
burst_win_4: 0.0000 0.0000 0.000000 0.000000 0 0 0 0
burst_date_5: 2018-05-30T05:16:44.952465
burst_start_time_5: 19004.9524650 s
sensing_date_5: 2018-05-30T05:16:46.103618
sensing_start_time_5: 19006.1036180 s
sensing_position_5: 4224950.8330 1606547.6817 5434543.3570 m m m
asc_node_delta_5: 2119.9902120 s
burst_asc_node_5: 768.5922088 s
burst_boffset_5: 1121807232
doppler_date_5: 2018-05-30T05:16:44.727278
doppler_time_5: 19004.727278 s
doppler_srdelay_5: 5.35566e-03 s
doppler_polynomial_5: -19.10814 -10253.02000 1.08385e+07 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00
az_fmrate_date_5: 2018-05-30T05:16:43.764538
az_fmrate_time_5: 19003.764538 s
az_fmrate_srdelay_5: 5.33235e-03 s
az_fmrate_polynomial_5: -2322.85425 452247.34911 -7.94476e+07 0.00000e+00
first_valid_sample_5: 1499 samples
last_valid_sample_5: 21905 samples
first_valid_line_5: 20 lines
last_valid_line_5: 1489 lines
burst_win_5: 0.0000 0.0000 0.000000 0.000000 0 0 0 0
burst_date_6: 2018-05-30T05:16:47.708966
burst_start_time_6: 19007.7089660 s
sensing_date_6: 2018-05-30T05:16:48.861895
sensing_start_time_6: 19008.8618950 s
sensing_position_6: 4241421.4674 1606901.5321 5421626.0250 m m m
asc_node_delta_6: 2122.7484890 s
burst_asc_node_6: 769.5922088 s
burst_boffset_6: 1402259040
doppler_date_6: 2018-05-30T05:16:47.485554
doppler_time_6: 19007.485554 s
doppler_srdelay_6: 5.35566e-03 s
doppler_polynomial_6: -20.53056 -437.36010 7.62673e+06 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00
az_fmrate_date_6: 2018-05-30T05:16:46.522815
az_fmrate_time_6: 19006.522815 s
az_fmrate_srdelay_6: 5.33235e-03 s
az_fmrate_polynomial_6: -2322.93728 452231.99782 -7.94342e+07 0.00000e+00
first_valid_sample_6: 1499 samples
last_valid_sample_6: 21905 samples
first_valid_line_6: 21 lines
last_valid_line_6: 1488 lines
burst_win_6: 0.0000 0.0000 0.000000 0.000000 0 0 0 0
burst_date_7: 2018-05-30T05:16:50.469578
burst_start_time_7: 19010.4695780 s
sensing_date_7: 2018-05-30T05:16:51.620172
sensing_start_time_7: 19011.6201720 s
sensing_position_7: 4257856.0869 1607235.0665 5408662.1371 m m m
asc_node_delta_7: 2125.5067660 s
burst_asc_node_7: 770.5922088 s
burst_boffset_7: 1682710848
doppler_date_7: 2018-05-30T05:16:50.243831
doppler_time_7: 19010.243831 s
doppler_srdelay_7: 5.35566e-03 s
doppler_polynomial_7: -26.57029 34766.18000 -3.44214e+07 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00
az_fmrate_date_7: 2018-05-30T05:16:49.281092
az_fmrate_time_7: 19009.281092 s
az_fmrate_srdelay_7: 5.33235e-03 s
az_fmrate_polynomial_7: -2323.03732 452217.93274 -7.94248e+07 0.00000e+00
first_valid_sample_7: 1499 samples
last_valid_sample_7: 21905 samples
first_valid_line_7: 20 lines
last_valid_line_7: 1488 lines
burst_win_7: 0.0000 0.0000 0.000000 0.000000 0 0 0 0
burst_date_8: 2018-05-30T05:16:53.224024
burst_start_time_8: 19013.2240240 s
sensing_date_8: 2018-05-30T05:16:54.378449
sensing_start_time_8: 19014.3784490 s
sensing_position_8: 4274254.5432 1607548.2964 5395651.8043 m m m
asc_node_delta_8: 2128.2650430 s
burst_asc_node_8: 771.5922088 s
burst_boffset_8: 1963162656
doppler_date_8: 2018-05-30T05:16:53.002108
doppler_time_8: 19013.002108 s
doppler_srdelay_8: 5.35566e-03 s
doppler_polynomial_8: -16.77215 -15864.88000 1.17528e+07 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00
az_fmrate_date_8: 2018-05-30T05:16:52.039369
az_fmrate_time_8: 19012.039369 s
az_fmrate_srdelay_8: 5.33235e-03 s
az_fmrate_polynomial_8: -2323.16705 452202.24927 -7.94063e+07 0.00000e+00
first_valid_sample_8: 1499 samples
last_valid_sample_8: 21905 samples
first_valid_line_8: 21 lines
last_valid_line_8: 1488 lines
burst_win_8: 0.0000 0.0000 0.000000 0.000000 0 0 0 0
burst_date_9: 2018-05-30T05:16:55.984636
burst_start_time_9: 19015.9846360 s
sensing_date_9: 2018-05-30T05:16:57.136726
sensing_start_time_9: 19017.1367260 s
sensing_position_9: 4290616.6879 1607841.2335 5382595.1380 m m m
asc_node_delta_9: 2131.0233200 s
burst_asc_node_9: 772.5922088 s
burst_boffset_9: 2243614464
doppler_date_9: 2018-05-30T05:16:55.760385
doppler_time_9: 19015.760385 s
doppler_srdel
ERROR: invalid starting and ending search line for sch_lines(): line1: -1 line2: 101 nl:101
ay_9: 5.35566e-03 s
doppler_polynomial_9: -29.97129 34533.26000 -2.32068e+07 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00
az_fmrate_date_9: 2018-05-30T05:16:54.797646
az_fmrate_time_9: 19014.797646 s
az_fmrate_srdelay_9: 5.33235e-03 s
az_fmrate_polynomial_9: -2323.23005 452185.36671 -7.93929e+07 0.00000e+00
first_valid_sample_9: 1499 samples
last_valid_sample_9: 21905 samples
first_valid_line_9: 21 lines
last_valid_line_9: 1488 lines
burst_win_9: 0.0000 0.0000 0.000000 0.000000 0 0 0 0
calibration LUT data: S1B_IW_SLC__1SDV_20180530T051633_20180530T051701_011146_01471D_9B4A.SAFE/annotation/calibration/calibration-s1b-iw1-slc-vv-20180530t051633-20180530t051659-011146-01471d-004.xml
number of calibration vectors: 30
number of values in a calibration vector: 583
calibration vector: 1 azimuth line: 0
i: 0 j: 0 rl[i][j]: 0 cc[i][j]: 3.349e+02
i: 0 j: 100 rl[i][j]: 4000 cc[i][j]: 3.287e+02
i: 0 j: 200 rl[i][j]: 8000 cc[i][j]: 3.232e+02
i: 0 j: 300 rl[i][j]: 12000 cc[i][j]: 3.182e+02
i: 0 j: 400 rl[i][j]: 16000 cc[i][j]: 3.138e+02
i: 0 j: 500 rl[i][j]: 20000 cc[i][j]: 3.098e+02
calibration vector: 6 azimuth line: 2598
i: 5 j: 0 rl[i][j]: 0 cc[i][j]: 3.349e+02
i: 5 j: 100 rl[i][j]: 4000 cc[i][j]: 3.286e+02
i: 5 j: 200 rl[i][j]: 8000 cc[i][j]: 3.231e+02
i: 5 j: 300 rl[i][j]: 12000 cc[i][j]: 3.182e+02
i: 5 j: 400 rl[i][j]: 16000 cc[i][j]: 3.138e+02
i: 5 j: 500 rl[i][j]: 20000 cc[i][j]: 3.098e+02
calibration vector: 11 azimuth line: 5363
i: 10 j: 0 rl[i][j]: 0 cc[i][j]: 3.348e+02
i: 10 j: 100 rl[i][j]: 4000 cc[i][j]: 3.285e+02
i: 10 j: 200 rl[i][j]: 8000 cc[i][j]: 3.230e+02
i: 10 j: 300 rl[i][j]: 12000 cc[i][j]: 3.181e+02
i: 10 j: 400 rl[i][j]: 16000 cc[i][j]: 3.137e+02
i: 10 j: 500 rl[i][j]: 20000 cc[i][j]: 3.097e+02
calibration vector: 16 azimuth line: 8128
i: 15 j: 0 rl[i][j]: 0 cc[i][j]: 3.346e+02
i: 15 j: 100 rl[i][j]: 4000 cc[i][j]: 3.284e+02
i: 15 j: 200 rl[i][j]: 8000 cc[i][j]: 3.229e+02
i: 15 j: 300 rl[i][j]: 12000 cc[i][j]: 3.180e+02
i: 15 j: 400 rl[i][j]: 16000 cc[i][j]: 3.136e+02
i: 15 j: 500 rl[i][j]: 20000 cc[i][j]: 3.096e+02
calibration vector: 21 azimuth line: 10894
i: 20 j: 0 rl[i][j]: 0 cc[i][j]: 3.344e+02
i: 20 j: 100 rl[i][j]: 4000 cc[i][j]: 3.282e+02
i: 20 j: 200 rl[i][j]: 8000 cc[i][j]: 3.227e+02
i: 20 j: 300 rl[i][j]: 12000 cc[i][j]: 3.178e+02
i: 20 j: 400 rl[i][j]: 16000 cc[i][j]: 3.134e+02
i: 20 j: 500 rl[i][j]: 20000 cc[i][j]: 3.095e+02
calibration vector: 26 azimuth line: 13658
i: 25 j: 0 rl[i][j]: 0 cc[i][j]: 3.345e+02
i: 25 j: 100 rl[i][j]: 4000 cc[i][j]: 3.283e+02
i: 25 j: 200 rl[i][j]: 8000 cc[i][j]: 3.228e+02
i: 25 j: 300 rl[i][j]: 12000 cc[i][j]: 3.179e+02
i: 25 j: 400 rl[i][j]: 16000 cc[i][j]: 3.135e+02
i: 25 j: 500 rl[i][j]: 20000 cc[i][j]: 3.095e+02
noise LUT data: S1B_IW_SLC__1SDV_20180530T051633_20180530T051701_011146_01471D_9B4A.SAFE/annotation/calibration/noise-s1b-iw1-slc-vv-20180530t051633-20180530t051659-011146-01471d-004.xml
number of noise vectors:
number of values in a noise vector: 583
Thanks for looking into this,
Julia
Replies (14)
par_S1_SLC fails for current S1 data - Added by Charles Werner over 6 years ago
Hello,
There was a change in the format, Here is a link to download the binaries for a
number of different platforms. Let me know if this resolves the issue. A Gamma
software release is coming in the next week.
http://dropbox.gamma-rs.ch/292147af-c995-492a-88e4-aa923dfc4988/par_S1_2018.zip
Best regards,
Charles Werner
RE: par_S1_SLC fails for current S1 data - Added by Julia Neelmeijer over 6 years ago
Hi Charles,
thank you very much for the quick update, so far it works well!
Best,
Julia
RE: par_S1_SLC fails for current S1 data - Added by Virginia Brancato almost 6 years ago
Dear Charles,
I am getting the same issue when running the par_S1_SLC on Sentinel-1A data acquired in 2018 and 2019. Anyway, I not able to access the binary file you provided in this topic of the forum.
Would it be possible to provide it again?
Thanks a lot.
Virginia
RE: par_S1_SLC fails for current S1 data - Added by Redmine Admin almost 6 years ago
Dear Virginia,
you have to open the link of the forum topic. There you will find the
download link for the file.
All the best,
Sylvia
Am 09.02.19 um 01:34 schrieb dep1doc@gfz-potsdam.de:
GAMMA Questions - Sentinel-1: RE: par_S1_SLC fails for current S1
data
<https://dep1doc.gfz-potsdam.de/boards/32/topics/325?r=379#message-379>/Virginia Brancato/
Dear Charles,
I am getting the same issue when running the par_S1_SLC on Sentinel-1A
data acquired in 2018 and 2019. Anyway, I not able to access the
binary file you provided in this topic of the forum.
Would it be possible to provide it again?Thanks a lot.
Virginia
You have received this notification because you have either subscribed
to it, or are involved in it.
To change your notification preferences, please click here:
http://dep1doc.gfz-potsdam.de
RE: par_S1_SLC fails for current S1 data - Added by Virginia Brancato almost 6 years ago
Actually, I tried to open it before submitting my question and it gives me an error message.
May be the file has been cancelled ...
RE: par_S1_SLC fails for current S1 data - Added by Redmine Admin almost 6 years ago
Please try to rename it to filename.zip and try again to extract it. But for now it's a redhat linux file only.
Sylvia
RE: par_S1_SLC fails for current S1 data - Added by Charles Werner almost 6 years ago
Hello,
For what OS do you which OS do you need the program. There was a change in the
S1 data format that necessitated the program change.
Charles
RE: par_S1_SLC fails for current S1 data - Added by Virginia Brancato almost 6 years ago
I using CentOS Linux release 7.5.1804 (Core)
RE: par_S1_SLC fails for current S1 data - Added by Virginia Brancato almost 6 years ago
No solution for this?
RE: par_S1_SLC fails for current S1 data - Added by Charles Werner almost 6 years ago
Hi,
There was an update for this program March last year, or even earlier. What
version of the program are you running?
What OS are you running now? I can send an update for the program. What OS are
you running?
RE: par_S1_SLC fails for current S1 data - Added by Virginia Brancato almost 6 years ago
I am running a 2015 version of Gamma and my OS is CentOS Linux release 7.5.1804
RE: par_S1_SLC fails for current S1 data - Added by Charles Werner almost 6 years ago
Hello,
Yes, the format was changed and this explains the issue.
attached is the current version of the program for Centos 7.
Best regards,
Charles
RE: par_S1_SLC fails for current S1 data - Added by Virginia Brancato almost 6 years ago
Thank you so much, Charles. It works perfectly :)